That Department Does Not Communicate Directly With Customers

by DJ Waldow on November 5, 2009

Flickr Photo (RyanK)Nothing is more important than the customer.

I’ve worked in the service industry most of my life. The above statement is true, nearly 100% of the time. I realize that there are times when the customer is wrong, when they are idiots, when you don’t want their business or to be associated with them, but for the most part, it’s a true statement. Now that we have that out of the way…

Time Warner Was Right, My Mom Was Wrong

Yeah. I’m being a bit sarcastic to make my point. My mom recently forwarded me the email exchange (below) that she had with Time Warner. I’ve posted the conversation in it’s entirety (with permission from my mom, of course). As you are reading, try to focus on the interaction between my mom (Sharon Dobkin) and the “Customer Care Advocate” (John Orzolick). After the reading, I’ll touch on a few issues I have with this.

Sit back, this is one of my longer posts.

—————-

I recently recieved a promotional postcard that I find particularly offensive.  The images show some very negative stereotypical images of men and women and mothers-in-law in particular. I am a college professor who teaches child development.  I work very hard to help students understand the dangers in presenting these negative stereotypes to children.  It would be nice to know that Time Warner understands this danger and would agree not to perpetuate it. I am currently on hold (phone) waiting for someone to refer me to the appropriate department and/or person to lodge my complaint.  In the meantime I am sending this email in the hope that if someone does not pick up this call (I have been waiting about 4 minutes, but have a class to go to in 5 minutes) at least someone at your organization will receive this message and be kind enough to return my call at XXX-XXX-XXXX. My husband and I  have been a Time Warner customer for a long time now. This advertisement is very disappointing.

Sincerely,
Sharon Dobkin, Ed.D.

—————-

Dear Sharon Dobkin,

Thank you for writing.  You have reached Time Warner Cable’s Office of the President.  Our office was able to retrieve the promotional ad from the local marketing department for own review.  We appreciate your feedback and understand you wish to express your concerns.  We have communicated your concern with the marketing department.

Regards,
John Orzolick
Customer Care Advocate
Time Warner Cable Corporate Office

—————-

Dear Mr. Orzolick,

Thank you for letting me know that you received my email.  A customer service representative did leave me two names and two phone numbers on my voice mail, but neither number is correct as she left off some necessary digits. (e.g.. 585-1297 and 585-1616). I am guessing these are extensions, and not complete phone numbers. In any event, I would appreciate the opportunity to speak to the individual responsible for approving such advertisements.  If you could point me in that direction or call me yourself at your earliest convenience, I would be most appreciative. I used a copy of your ad in my Child Development class today, and even freshman/sophomore college students recognized the problem.  I told them that I would let them know how Time Warner responds to my (and now their) concerns.

Sincerely,
Sharon Dobkin

—————-

Dear Sharon Dobkin,

Unfortunately, that department does not communicate directly with customers. However, we have the ability to provide them with customer feedback and your concerns were sent to them for their review.

The phone numbers that were provided were not from this office.  They may be local numbers without the area code indicated.

Regards,

John Orzolick
Customer Care Advocate
Time Warner Cable Corporate Office

—————-

Dear Mr. orzolick,

Although I am not sure that I understand the purpose of such a policy, I guess it is what it is. Having said that, I still would appreciate a response from Time Warner. Something in writing would be fine if your marketing representatives are not willing or able to speak with me directly. My students and I are still interested in how your company views this advertisement and how you will proceed.

Respectfully,
Sharon Dobkin, Ed.D

—————-

Dear Sharon Dobkin,

I understand you wish for a response and an explanation of how we will proceed. The previous email we have provided you with is our response and will be reiterated in this email. Please consider this our response and how we will proceed. Your concern has been forwarded to the marketing department. That department receives a multitude of feedback in regards to all of our advertisements. Different people have different opinions on each and every advertisement we display. Due to the multitude of feedback that department does receive, a response is not provided to each feedback regarding whether there was a decision to continue or discontinue the advertisement in question. In regards to our view of the advertisement, all of our advertisements are evaluated prior to being launched.

Regards,

John Orzolick
Customer Care Advocate
Time Warner Cable Corporate Office

—————-

Dear Mr. Orzolick,

What I am beginning to understand is that Time Warner approved of this advertisement prior to its placement and has no intention of reviewing it at the corporate level.  I also now understand that Time Warner  sees my reaction to this advertisement as a particular viewpoint, not based on any empirical evidence, but more of an “opinion” of an individual consumer.  Further, my email reflecting my “different opinion” is likely to find itself on a large heap of emails  that “Due to the multitude of feedback that department does receive, a response is not provided to each feedback regarding whether there was a decision to continue or discontinue the advertisement in question.”

I find this disappointing, in that all it would take is a simple email which so far you have been able to (to your credit) find the time to send.  I don’t really think a request for a follow up response is out of line or excessively demanding.  I do however understand that you have “reiterated” your first email and will accept this as your last.

So that the students I teach understand that taking the time to monitor what they pay to consume is both their privilege and right, I intend to encourage them to discuss this advertisement with any and all people they talk to.  It will be interesting to see what responses they get.

As they know, there are virtually volumes of research indicating that the type of negative stereotyping portrayed in this ad effects people in important ways that contributes to continued sexism (just to name one “ism”) in our society.

Respectfully,
Sharon Dobkin, Ed.D.
Professor of Psychology
Monroe Community College
Rochester, New York 14623

What Is Wrong With This Picture?

As stated above, I could write an entire post that is dedicated to the offensive ad. That’s for another day. What I’m hoping caused you disappointment (and shock?) was the response from John Orzolick, “Customer Care Advocate” (quotes intentional). More on his title later. Let me now break down a few statements that Mr. Orzolick not only typed, but actually sent via email.

1. That department does not communicate directly with customers. – So let me get this right, there are departments within Time Warner that are not allowed to communicate with customers? Really? Whoa. If John is really the Customer Care Advocate as his title says, how is he advocating?

2. The phone numbers that were provided were not from this office.  They may be local numbers without the area code indicated. – Fair enough. Good feedback. But again, John is the Customer Care Advocate. Should he not be helping instead of just stating a fact?

3. The previous email we have provided you with is our response and will be reiterated in this email. Please consider this our response and how we will proceed. - I realize I’m taking my mom’s side on this one, but that reply is just outright rude and condescending. He is talking down to my mom. Uncalled for and unprofessional…especially from the “Customer Care Advocate.”

4. Different people have different opinions on each and every advertisement we display. – Again. This is a very fair statement. However, my mom is a college professor who is teaching a course on Child Development and using the Time Warner ad to showcase what not to do. As she states in her reply, this is not opinion, but based on empirical evidence. I’d think that “Mr. Customer Care Advocate” would value her expert opinion and maybe even want to consider her statements more closely instead of lumping them with all other people.

It’s Nearly 2010

I think a few decades ago, companies were able to get away with this type of reply. After all, there was no email, no internet, no social media listening tools as we know them today. Customer Service Departments could reply like this over the phone and only a handful of people would even notice. But it’s nearly 2010. Thanks to the internet, email, social media, etc, word travels a lot faster. Both good and bad customer service stories not only spread, but are recorded in history forever (thanks Google!).

For those that know me, you know I’m overall a very positive person. However this email exchange between my mother and Time Warner makes me ill. I’m hoping that someone in their office reads this and realizes that when you hire someone to be your “Customer Care Advocate” you must look for a person that is a true advocate, a person who has the best interest of the customer in mind.

My role as Director of Community for Blue Sky Factory has made me acutely aware of the importance of hiring the right people for the right job. It’s critical that those individuals and teams who are customer-facing need to also be customer advocates.

Time Warner. Are you out there? Are you listening? Do you care?

Photo Credit: RyanK

DJ Waldow
@djwaldow

  • alexcarlson
    Dear DJ I read your blog now & want to know more about your customer care experience .

    Thanks
  • alfsan
    Hi, First of all I have been on both sides of the story, well, not in the position of "Customer Care Advocate" but nevertheless being the face of my company in some regional markets. Also, my experience comes from multinational companies in latin american countries. First, I am amazed that a company as large as Time Warner DID answer the mail, although a response time would be nice to know (if it was less than a week or over a week). Second, there was a direct answer. Mr. Orzolick did take the time to review the problem, saw the ad and acted according to procedure, in case there's a procedure for offensive ads. Third, Mr. Orzolick did gave an answer to all mails. So far, he did a "normal job", that is, he fulfilled the description of his position.

    But again, it depends on where you are.

    On developed markets where internet penetration is highest, like the US, filling the steady "job description" for customer service, that is "answering mails" is not enough. Because cases like this show up. Someone with a powerful blog posts the issue, and then BOOM! everyone is aware, and I',m sure Mr. Orzolick by now has had his ears pulled! and Time Warner is aware of this issue, and also at some point will review its marketing strategy on ads more thoroughly.

    As said, in current society, where empowerment is vital, and issues come down like tropical rain, people want and need answers, like your mom. So in other words, the last answers of the mail to my point of view were mediocre and pointless, although we all must accept there was an answer, then again, in this days this is not enough!
  • @alfsan: Thanks for your comments and perspective. To answer some of your questions...they actually replied to the email within a matter of hours (I think). That's a good thing, but if your title is "Customer Care Advocate" I'd expect that. In fact, if your company is as large as Time Warner, I'd demand it. I think too often companies have such crappy customer service that we are "wow'd" when they reply. Why should the bar be so low? Also, since when is it enough to have a person that is on the front lines do a "normal job?" I'd think that part of his job would be to go above and beyond the call of duty...not just "fulfill the description of his job."

    I realize your last 2 paragraphs talk more to these questions, but I'd love to hear more of what you think. Please share!

    DJ Waldow
    @djwaldow
  • A perfect example of "following the customer support script" and not really caring about the customer.
  • @Marissa: Yeah. Wasted opportunity, huh? Thanks for your comments!

    DJ Waldow
    @djwaldow
  • I think what I liked least about the responses from the Customer Care Advocate was that they were written in completely stiff corporate-speak. There was zero attempt at actual human language to connect with the customer. I do think this makes a big difference and the more I get exposed to corporate speak, the less I like it. I am further confused because I am forced to write this way frequently on behalf of my company.
    .-= Royce´s last blog ..Better by Atul Gawande: Chapter 4 =-.
  • @Royce: Why are your forced to write that way for your company too? Maybe you should share this post w/ them.

    DJ Waldow
    @djwaldow
  • @Sid: Thanks for the validation. Looking forward to hearing if you buddy who works at TWC-Carolinas can pull through. I forwarded this post to the "Customer Care Advocate" and...nothing.

    @Christina: Yeah. I tried to make that point about his title in my post. Crazy, right?

    @Brian: Thanks for your comments. I'm still shocked by this. I was really hoping for at least an acknowledgment from TWC. Probably silly of me for even hoping.

    @Scott (aka, Daddy Scott): Yeah. Funny. The title of this post was originally going to be "Wow."

    @Brad: Agreed, but being a near monopoly is not an excuse to suck, is it?

    @Maddy: Ha ha. Yeah, my mom is pretty cool. She's now reading my blog! w00t!

    @Jess: Thanks for stopping by. I miss not being able to call you a client! The more I learn about TWC, the more I really don't love them...

    --
    DJ Waldow
    @djwaldow
  • word to your mom. she took the right route - voiced her concerns in a respectful manner, to be met with those answers is a shame, especially considering if given the chance she could have provided them with some helpful insight and market research via her role as a professor.

    but seems like time warner has a lot of work to do on company policies, starting from the top...
    Time Warner still has 3 Corporate Jets that Should be Sold
    .-= jess moschetti´s last blog ..ibexgirl: btw the music selection was limited, or @ibexwool loves emo instrumental soft rock, either or =-.
  • Maddy Hubbard
    Your mom is AWESOME!

    She took the time to lay out her concerns. I don't think asking for a reply was out of bounds.

    Time Warner should be ashamed of their condecending (lack of) response.
  • Scott,

    Coming from most companies, I would find this surprising. From Time Warner, though, it seems par for the course. They know that their competition in most markets is very limited, particularly when it comes to broadband service. Where I live, for example, I have the option of the phone company's slowest DSL line or Time Warner's service. For anything other than basic web surfing, I'm forced to use TWC. I guess they've let that mentality go to their head instead of remembering that customers put the money in their coffers.
    .-= Brad Gurley´s last blog ..AT&T files suit; Verizon has a map for that =-.
  • DJ,

    I think the best word here is "Wow." And not in a good way. Clearly Time Warner has no intention of coming out of their corporate vacuum.

    Your mom tried to approach them from the vantage of constructive criticism. This wasn't an angry, expletive-laden letter. It was thoughtful, constructive, with your mother expressing a willingness, nay an eagerness to be helpful.

    The reaction is abominable. Like I said, wow. Disappointing and a bit surprising.
    .-= Scott Cohen´s last blog ..The Nora Chronicles: The First Breath =-.
  • Definitely a good point to make.

    It can be bad for business if word gets out that your business addresses community concerns from an ivory tower. We all know the old saying about how an unhappy customer tells twice as many people as his or her happy counterpart, but this is practically 2010. An unhappy customer can tell pretty much everyone these days. It's critical that big business, who might have no trouble at all visiting Washington with hat in hand, demonstrates that they're listening to their customers.

    There are plenty of customers who make contact to voice pathetic, baseless complaints (sad people just looking to vent), but to generically address the customer from a lowest common denominator perspective is foolhardy.
    .-= Brian Driggs´s last blog ..Bad Driving Habits: Bad Business Habits =-.
  • The irony of his title is fabulous. I wonder if he ever thinks about it?
    .-= Christina´s last blog ..The Prank's On You, "Anonymous" Caller =-.
  • I know it hits closer to home b/c this is your mom DJ, but be assured this response from TW outright garbage. Little more than a blow-off in fact.

    Hmmmm, If I owned a business and I was about to get some FREE consulting services from a PROFESSOR in psychology on the marketing tactics I've decide to implement, I guess I would decline it too and continue blindly insulting who we all know is the real decision maker for cable service in most homes (or at least the one who checks the mail and chucks the junk before any wallet has a chance to read it).

    Let me share this in hopes that someone will know someone @ TW who has a little sense and will offer an intelligent reply to the SBFGuy.

    Sid.
    .-= Sid Prince´s last blog ..I Break for NaNoWriMo =-.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: